Difference between revisions of "Act"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<!-- you can have any number of categories here -->
 
[[Category:Libertarian Propaganda Terms]]
 
[[Category:Libertarian Propaganda Terms]]
[[Category: Praxeology]]
+
[[Category:Praxeology]]
[[Category: Austrian Economics]]
+
[[Category:Philosophical Individualism]]
{{DES | des = A dog-whistle term that pretends to give a formal, axiomatic basis for Austrian Economics.  This redefinition excludes much actual human economic behavior.  Also "Action".}}
+
[[Category:Austrian Economics]]
 +
{{DES | des = A [[dog-whistle]] term that pretends to give a formal, axiomatic basis for Austrian Economics.  This redefinition excludes much actual human economic behavior.  Also "Action". | show=}}
 +
<!-- insert wiki page text here -->
 +
 
 
A Rothbardian redefinition, also for the term ACTION.
 
A Rothbardian redefinition, also for the term ACTION.
  
Line 8: Line 12:
 
[http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard38.html Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics]
 
[http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard38.html Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics]
  
This dog-whistle term from Austrian Economics differs from standard English usage by:
+
This [[dog-whistle]] term from Austrian Economics differs from standard English usage by:
  
 
* the requirement for the actor to be an individual
 
* the requirement for the actor to be an individual
Line 25: Line 29:
 
"The fact that an action is in the regular course of affairs performed spontaneously, as it were, does not mean that it is not due to a conscious volition and to a deliberate choice. Indulgence in a routine which possibly could be changed is action."
 
"The fact that an action is in the regular course of affairs performed spontaneously, as it were, does not mean that it is not due to a conscious volition and to a deliberate choice. Indulgence in a routine which possibly could be changed is action."
 
These caveats remove all the logical strength of the original definition, and make any particular case a matter of authority about whether or not the term applies.
 
These caveats remove all the logical strength of the original definition, and make any particular case a matter of authority about whether or not the term applies.
 +
 +
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 +
<!-- otherwise, we would use {{Links}} and {{Quotes}}  -->
 +
{{List|title=Act|links=true}}
 +
{{Quotations|title=Act|quotes=true}}

Latest revision as of 23:51, 15 August 2020