Difference between revisions of "Critiques Of Libertarianism:About"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
What that works out to in practice is that I disagree with most libertarian complaints about taxation and redistribution, agree with many about needless government interference in private lives, and disagree with most libertarian proposals for reforms. For example, I too dislike the prohibitionary "war on drugs" and think it is very harmful. But while I would legalize most drug usage for recreation, I would do so under a regulatory policy that would address what I consider real, harmful problems due to a variety of market failures. Likewise tobacco.
 
What that works out to in practice is that I disagree with most libertarian complaints about taxation and redistribution, agree with many about needless government interference in private lives, and disagree with most libertarian proposals for reforms. For example, I too dislike the prohibitionary "war on drugs" and think it is very harmful. But while I would legalize most drug usage for recreation, I would do so under a regulatory policy that would address what I consider real, harmful problems due to a variety of market failures. Likewise tobacco.
 +
 +
==== You're ideological too! ====
 +
I don’t need [[ideology]] to rebut your libertarian arguments. Your ideology is YOUR weakness. It provides you with a bountiful supply of ready-made errors to spare you the pain of rubbing your own two brain cells together to come up with an original idea. Your ideology [[Historical Revisionism|necessarily makes stuff up and ignores the real world where it is inconvenient]]. I don’t need ideology to spot such lies and omissions.
  
 
==== You don't criticize the real basis of libertarianism, only strawmen. ====
 
==== You don't criticize the real basis of libertarianism, only strawmen. ====
Line 51: Line 54:
 
This has also been expressed as "Dogs don't bark at tombstones". My initial response is that dogs DO pee on tombstones.
 
This has also been expressed as "Dogs don't bark at tombstones". My initial response is that dogs DO pee on tombstones.
 
Of course, I could observe that with numerous web responses to my FAQ alone, libertarians seem afraid of me. That's the problem with those sorts of rhetorical arguments: they cut too many ways. But many libertarians seem to like them.
 
Of course, I could observe that with numerous web responses to my FAQ alone, libertarians seem afraid of me. That's the problem with those sorts of rhetorical arguments: they cut too many ways. But many libertarians seem to like them.
 +
 +
==== Why do you do this? ====
 +
It's much like the show "Adam Ruins Everything", except that I started before he was born.  Debunking mistaken ideas is beneficial for all.
 +
{{QuoteOne|Mike Huben's Criticisms/slight}}

Revision as of 15:54, 8 October 2019