Difference between revisions of "Democracy: Probably a Good Thing/devastated"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
[[Category:Jason Brennan]]
 
[[Category:Jason Brennan]]
 
[[Category:Democracy]]
 
[[Category:Democracy]]
 +
[[Category:Discrimination]]
 
{{Quote
 
{{Quote
 
| text = The actual case Brennan advances can be devastated rather quickly, since it suffers from a central logical flaw that renders the whole core argument worthless... By presenting democracy with all its warts, but giving no thought to how “epistocracies” work in practice, Brennan avoids confronting the difficult fact that his preferred system of government, if adopted, will almost certainly reinstate Jim Crow...  But at least Brennan is honest in exposing the libertarian project as fundamentally opposed to the basic rights of human beings, its grand paeans to liberty being thin cover for taking the vote away from poor people.
 
| text = The actual case Brennan advances can be devastated rather quickly, since it suffers from a central logical flaw that renders the whole core argument worthless... By presenting democracy with all its warts, but giving no thought to how “epistocracies” work in practice, Brennan avoids confronting the difficult fact that his preferred system of government, if adopted, will almost certainly reinstate Jim Crow...  But at least Brennan is honest in exposing the libertarian project as fundamentally opposed to the basic rights of human beings, its grand paeans to liberty being thin cover for taking the vote away from poor people.
 
| cite = [[Nathan Robinson]], "{{Link |Democracy: Probably a Good Thing}}"
 
| cite = [[Nathan Robinson]], "{{Link |Democracy: Probably a Good Thing}}"
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 14:40, 3 February 2021