Difference between revisions of "Diversity In Libertarianism"
From Critiques Of Libertarianism
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:What Is Wrong With Libertarianism|100]] | [[Category:What Is Wrong With Libertarianism|100]] | ||
| − | {{DES | des = Libertarianism is diverse. Libertarianism can be left or right, rationalist or antirationalist, essentialist or pragmatist, hardcore or soft core, based on rights or liberty or values, using Austrian or Chicago or other economics, statist or anarchist, political or philosophical, etc. No argument can truly be representative of all libertarianisms. Discussions will be incoherent if they change from one libertarianism to another without noticing. And there is no true, correct libertarianism: that would be an essentialist fallacy. These problems can be avoided if arguments are focussed on one specific libertarian viewpoint at a time.}} | + | {{DES | des = Libertarianism is diverse. Libertarianism can be left or right, rationalist or antirationalist, essentialist or pragmatist, hardcore or soft core, based on rights or liberty or values, using Austrian or Chicago or other economics, statist or anarchist, political or philosophical, etc. No argument can truly be representative of all libertarianisms. Discussions will be incoherent if they change from one libertarianism to another without noticing. And there is no true, correct libertarianism: that would be an essentialist fallacy. These problems can be avoided if arguments are focussed on one specific libertarian viewpoint at a time.}}Part of [[What Is Wrong With Libertarianism]]. |
| + | |||
text after template | text after template | ||
It would be nice if there was a simple dismissal of libertarianism, but there are so many different kinds that no one argument could apply. | It would be nice if there was a simple dismissal of libertarianism, but there are so many different kinds that no one argument could apply. | ||
