Libertarians hate this limitation on property rights, ranting incessantly. And when used corruptly, it is detestable to all. But it does have an important role to play in overcoming a common market failure called the Tragedy Of The Anticommons. The key concept is that property ownership is not an unmitigated good, and, worse yet, it can lead to economic gridlock and underutilization of resources.
- Holdouts (1 link)
- Construction projects are often halted or expensively modified because some owners refuse to sell property needed for a project. Called "nail houses" in China.
- Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain (book)
- (1985) Richard Epstein takes the Lockean Fable about property seriously, and builds cloud-castles of his wished-for law upon it.
- The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives (book) (1 link)
- "Usually, private ownership creates wealth, but too much ownership has the opposite effect -- it creates gridlock. When too many people own pieces of one thing, whether a physical or intellectual resource, cooperation breaks down, wealth disappears, and everybody loses."
- The Permission Problem [More...]
- A good explanation of the Tragedy Of The Anticommons market failure based on the book "The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives" by Michael Heller.
No quotations found in this category.