Difference between revisions of "Free Trade With China Wasn't Such a Great Idea for the U.S."

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "<!-- you can have any number of categories here --> Category:Noah Smith Category:Globalization, Free Trade and Economic Freedom <!-- 1 URL must be followed by >= 0 Oth...")
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
<!-- {{Old URL | url = }} -->
 
<!-- {{Old URL | url = }} -->
 
{{End URL}}
 
{{End URL}}
{{DES | des = The benefits of international trade can be subverted by strategic interventions by governments.  An "always free trade" policy leaves us vulnerable to the strategies of other nations. | show=}}
+
{{DES | des = An important recent study shows powerful evidence that industries and regions that have been more exposed to Chinese import competition since 2000 -- the year China joined the World Trade Organization -- have been hit hard and have not recovered. Workers in these industries and regions don't go on to better jobs, or even similar jobs in different industries. Instead, they shuffle from low-paid job to low-paid job, never recovering the prosperity they had before Chinese competition hit.  | show=}}
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- normally, we would use {{Links}} and {{Quotes}}  -->
 
<!-- normally, we would use {{Links}} and {{Quotes}}  -->

Revision as of 14:04, 27 January 2016