Difference between revisions of "Ineffective FDA criticism by "Professors Of Liberty""

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 13: Line 13:
 
<!-- {{Old URL | url = }} -->
 
<!-- {{Old URL | url = }} -->
 
{{End URL}}
 
{{End URL}}
{{DES | des = [[Scott Ballantyne]] thumps [[John McPherson]], [[Robert Higgs]], [[Tibor Machan]], [[Robin Hanson]] , [[Jan Narveson]] and [[Mary Ruwart]], all for relying on ideology rather than real analysis.  None of them seem to get it. Key sentence: "if Dr. Ruwart and her colleagues can convince the majority of the scientific community who specialize in drug regulations and health care economics that we should privatize the FDA --  then sign me up too." He points out that ll their sources are ideologically tainted and not peer reviewed. | show=}}
+
{{DES | des = [[Scott Ballantyne]] thumps [[John McPherson]], [[Robert Higgs]], [[Tibor Machan]], [[Robin Hanson]] , [[Jan Narveson]] and [[Mary Ruwart]], all for relying on ideology rather than real analysis.  None of them seem to get it. Key sentence: "if Dr. Ruwart and her colleagues can convince the majority of the scientific community who specialize in drug regulations and health care economics that we should privatize the FDA --  then sign me up too." It's obvious that they and their sources are ideologically tainted and not peer reviewed. | show=}}
 
<!-- insert wiki page text here -->
 
<!-- insert wiki page text here -->
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->

Latest revision as of 16:47, 31 January 2021