Difference between revisions of "Intellectual Property Reform"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
[[Category:Libertarians Criticizing Each Other]]
 
[[Category:Libertarians Criticizing Each Other]]
 
[[Category:Tragedy Of The Anticommons]]
 
[[Category:Tragedy Of The Anticommons]]
 +
[[Category:Obstructing Regulation And Regulatory Capture]]
 
{{DES | des = Many others besides libertarians propose reform or abolition of intellectual property.  Some libertarians oppose it ideologically because it is obviously a government creation, others scream "my property!"  Many non-libertarians pragmatically question whether it actually advances the useful arts. The US Constitution does not mandate intellectual property because even then it was controversial whether it was a net benefit.  A good alternative has been public subsidy of research. | show=}}
 
{{DES | des = Many others besides libertarians propose reform or abolition of intellectual property.  Some libertarians oppose it ideologically because it is obviously a government creation, others scream "my property!"  Many non-libertarians pragmatically question whether it actually advances the useful arts. The US Constitution does not mandate intellectual property because even then it was controversial whether it was a net benefit.  A good alternative has been public subsidy of research. | show=}}
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->

Revision as of 17:35, 19 October 2017