Difference between revisions of "Inviolable Private Sphere of Rights"
From Critiques Of Libertarianism
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Category:Fallacies Of Philosophy]] | [[Category:Fallacies Of Philosophy]] | ||
[[Category:Failures Of Libertarian Philosophy]] | [[Category:Failures Of Libertarian Philosophy]] | ||
| − | {{DES | des = A classic [[Fallacies_Of_Philosophy#Reifications|reification]]. But also grossly misleading: actual rights cannot be inviolable because that would be incredibly expensive. Nor can | + | {{DES | des = A classic [[Fallacies_Of_Philosophy#Reifications|reification]]. But also grossly misleading: actual (legal) rights cannot be inviolable because that would be incredibly expensive. Nor can rights be sphere-like: innumerable exceptions must be carved out to prevent conflict, to reflect what people actually care about and to keep enforcement costs down. A better topological model would be a swiss cheese. | show=}} |
<!-- insert wiki page text here --> | <!-- insert wiki page text here --> | ||
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them. Use these explicit workarounds. --> | <!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them. Use these explicit workarounds. --> | ||
