Difference between revisions of "Libertarian Self-Delusions"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Basics|850]]
+
<!-- you can have any number of categories here -->
{{DES | des = Libertarians believe many weird things about themselves compared to others.}}
+
[[Category:Issues]]
 
+
[[Category:Fallacies Of Ideology]]
; We libertarians are rational, they are not.
+
[[Category:Descriptions Of Libertarianism]]
: People's thinking is based upon their values and premises.  You cannot judge somebody else's rationality without adopting their values and premises for the judgement.  There is very little evidence that libertarians do that, or judge fairly.  Instead, the vulgar libertarian "logic" simply identifies that other people don't hold the same values or premises.
+
{{DES | des = Libertarians believe many weird things about themselves compared to others. Many are splendid examples of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect Dunning–Kruger effect]. See also: [[Derp]]. | show=}}
 
+
<!-- insert wiki page text here -->
; We understand the Constitution, they do not.
+
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in themUse these explicit workarounds. -->
: This attitude shows a profound ignorance of how the law ascribes meaning to documents such as the Constitution. First and foremost, the current meaning must take into account all subsequent legislation and court rulings. If I declared the elections of southern representatives to be invalid because they were apportioned too many seats (their black constituents should have been counted as 3/5 according to the Constitution), I would be laughed at because of my ignorance of the 14th amendment. Likewise if I ignore later judicial interpretations.  Second, there must be one shared meaning, which requires social construction.  If a libertarian swears that he is reading the meaning "literally", so may anybody else: you still require a social judgement of what the "literal" reading is. If you get as far as deciding that a "literal" reading is the appropriate way to understand the document.  Third, general statements such as those in the Constitution have problems with precision and conflict with other statements in the same ConstitutionThose problems have no clear, inerrant solution: they must be resolved by some interpretive authority.
+
<!-- otherwise, we would use {{Links}} and {{Quotes}} -->
 
+
{{List|title=Libertarian Self-Delusions|links=true}}
; We see clearly: you have all been brainwashed by government, mainstream economics, liberal media, etc.
+
{{Quotations|title=Libertarian Self-Delusions|quotes=true}}
: This is a common propaganda technique: accuse your opponents of your own failings.  The great fallacy is that even if we HAVE been brainwashed, that doesn't make libertarian fallacies any more correct.
+
 
+
; We are all individuals.
+
: One of the great lines from Monty Python's "The Life Of Brian".  Brian is trying to dissuade the crowd from proclaiming him the messiah, telling them not to follow him, and he says "You are all individuals." The crowd responds obediently in unison "We are all individuals."  Like Christians, most libertarians are indoctrinated with the same small set of basic texts and, despite their diversity, tend not to vary very much from the same small set of beliefs.
+
 
+
; Libertarianism is democratic.
+
: No, it is not.  Take Nozick, for example: in [[Anarchy, State and Utopia]] he does not use the word democracy, and uses the word democratic in only four places late in the book when discussing how there are market alternatives.  In the [[Ayn Rand Lexicon]], Rand is openly disdainful of democracy.  David Boaz, in [[Libertarianism: A Primer]] page 14, states "Libertarians, as the name implies, believe that the most important value is liberty, not democracy."  Some libertarians such as [[R. J. Rummel]] conflate libertarianism with democracy.
+

Latest revision as of 12:47, 12 October 2017