Difference between revisions of "Libertarianism and Pollution"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
<!-- {{Old URL | url = }} -->
 
<!-- {{Old URL | url = }} -->
 
{{End URL}}
 
{{End URL}}
{{DES | des = Libertarian [[Matt Zwolinski]] points out that the libertarian theories of rights of Nozick, Rothbard, and Mack don't work for [[pollution]] problems.  He also says "[Free-Market Environmentalism] can serve as a supplement to a theory of rights, and never as a substitute for one."  He concludes that there is currently no good libertarian solution, using the euphemism "a fruitful subject for future research." | show=}}
+
{{DES | des = Libertarian [[Matt Zwolinski]] points out that the libertarian theories of rights of Nozick, Rothbard, and Mack don't work for [[pollution]] problems.  He also says "[Free-Market Environmentalism] can serve as a supplement to a theory of rights, and never as a substitute for one."  He concludes that there is currently no good libertarian solution, using the euphemism "a fruitful subject for future research." It never occurs to him that essentially government holds rights and powers which solve these problems. | show=}}
 
<!-- insert wiki page text here -->
 
<!-- insert wiki page text here -->
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->

Revision as of 02:51, 22 April 2020