Difference between revisions of "Libertarians Are Huge Fans of Economic Coercion/coercion"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "<!-- you can have any number of categories here --> Category:Matt Bruenig Category:Laissez Faire Category:Libertarian Hypocrisy Category:Robert Hale Category...")
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
[[Category:Coercion]]
 
[[Category:Coercion]]
 
[[Category:Law]]
 
[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Progressivism]]{Quote
+
[[Category:Progressivism]]
 +
{{Quote
 
| text = What’s amusing about libertarians and laissez-faire people (and the loose way certain economists talk) is that they will describe my choice to pay rent as non-coerced and voluntary while describing my choice to pay income taxes as coerced and involuntary. But there is no neutral construction of “coercion” that would ever support such a distinction. As Hale aptly demonstrates, coercion occurs when there are “background constraints on the universe of socially available choices from which an individual might ‘freely’ choose.”
 
| text = What’s amusing about libertarians and laissez-faire people (and the loose way certain economists talk) is that they will describe my choice to pay rent as non-coerced and voluntary while describing my choice to pay income taxes as coerced and involuntary. But there is no neutral construction of “coercion” that would ever support such a distinction. As Hale aptly demonstrates, coercion occurs when there are “background constraints on the universe of socially available choices from which an individual might ‘freely’ choose.”
 
| cite = [[Matt Bruenig]], "{{Link |Libertarians Are Huge Fans of Economic Coercion}}"
 
| cite = [[Matt Bruenig]], "{{Link |Libertarians Are Huge Fans of Economic Coercion}}"
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 11:53, 25 February 2016