Difference between revisions of "Libertarians Misunderstand Coercion"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 36: Line 36:
 
Hayek (Const.OL p. 21) switches to ought when he has individuals creating their own private spheres.  But really cannot prevent government from having rules about taxation and redistribution.  He also has government mold the environment of rules in which the spontaneous order is to occur: but government is a rationalist order.
 
Hayek (Const.OL p. 21) switches to ought when he has individuals creating their own private spheres.  But really cannot prevent government from having rules about taxation and redistribution.  He also has government mold the environment of rules in which the spontaneous order is to occur: but government is a rationalist order.
  
Markets are not non-coercive solutions to [[collective action problems]]: they rely on the problem being solved already by the coercive creation of property and rights.  Even simple strategies such as tit-for-tat and shunning rely on that same coercive background to protect the players.
+
Markets are actually coercive solutions to [[collective action problems]]: they rely on the coercive creation of property and rights.  Even simple strategies such as tit-for-tat and shunning rely on that same coercive background to protect the players.

Latest revision as of 18:39, 3 June 2021