Difference between revisions of "Libertarians Misunderstand Government"
From Critiques Of Libertarianism
(Created page with '(Currently, this is simply a hodgepodge of misc points to be rewritten.) Libertarians are generally guilty of misrepresenting government. First, they discuss government as if it…') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ( | + | <!-- you can have any number of categories here --> |
| + | [[Category:Mike Huben]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Government|200]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Anarcho-capitalism|100]] | ||
| + | {{DES | des = Libertarians are generally guilty of misrepresenting government. They also overlook the fact that [[Anarcho-capitalism|anarcho-capitalist]] land ownership does not differ from government by a dictator: the landowner can require anything he wants on his land, including abiding by his rules (laws), taxes, and punishments (up to and including death) by the contract to be on his land. | show=}} | ||
| + | <!-- insert wiki page text here --> | ||
| − | Libertarians are generally guilty of misrepresenting government. First, they discuss government as if it is monolithic, but it is not. Modern government is dispersed in two ways: by separation of powers among three branches and by division of responsibilities among federal, state, local, and non-government authorities. Second, libertarians represent government as a source of coercion, but it is not. Government is where we | + | Libertarians are generally guilty of misrepresenting government. First, they discuss government as if it is monolithic, but it is not. Modern government is dispersed in two ways: by separation of powers among three branches and by division of responsibilities among federal, state, local, and non-government authorities. Second, libertarians represent government as a source of coercion, but it is not. Coercion is an inherent ability of people that cannot be eliminated and is pervasive through almost all social interaction. Government is where we deliberately channel coercion because the alternative (the private sector) gives much worse results, as the history of privately owned states (monarchies, dictatorships, and other despotisms) and private "law" such as slavery, mafias, warlords, etc. show rather clearly. We have constructed a government that is jointly owned by all, because private ownership gives too much incentive for private profit through coercion of others. |
| + | |||
| + | Government is NOT a monopoly of violence/coercion: it is a monopoly on determining legality of them. Big difference. Because in the US and most other nations, private violence is often permitted for defense and protection of property and other rights. | ||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | (Currently, this is simply a hodgepodge of misc points to be rewritten.) | ||
Bundling of decisions is easily confused with coercion. For example, | Bundling of decisions is easily confused with coercion. For example, | ||
| − | accepting employment at will equates all orders with "voluntary agreement". | + | accepting employment at will equates all orders with "voluntary agreement". In law, bundling is called standard form or adhesion contract. |
Why not then for social contract? | Why not then for social contract? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Libertarians will not explain why government works as well as it does. They have numerous theories of government failure, but ignore explanations of government success (such as the creation of the market system.) A prime example of confirmation bias. | ||
The inescapable evils of coercion are not unique to government. | The inescapable evils of coercion are not unique to government. | ||
| Line 77: | Line 88: | ||
http://flag.blackened.net/daver/anarchism/iron_fist.html | http://flag.blackened.net/daver/anarchism/iron_fist.html | ||
As a mutualist anarchist, I believe that expropriation of surplus value--i.e., capitalism--cannot occur without state coercion to maintain the privilege of usurer, landlord, and capitalist. | As a mutualist anarchist, I believe that expropriation of surplus value--i.e., capitalism--cannot occur without state coercion to maintain the privilege of usurer, landlord, and capitalist. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | "The only thing that makes a government special is its monopoly on legitimate violence." | ||
| + | Government is not a monopoly of legitimate violence (force) in the US: there are federal, state, county, and local governments, all of which can use force. They all have their own laws and police, and many have their own courts. Individuals are also allowed many sorts of legitimate violence in defense of person and property, as any gunloon can tell you. Indeed, the US was set up that way precisely to avoid problems of monopoly. | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them. Use these explicit workarounds. --> | ||
| + | <!-- otherwise, we would use {{Links}} and {{Quotes}} --> | ||
| + | {{List|title=Libertarians Misunderstand Government|links=true}} | ||
| + | {{Quotations|title=Libertarians Misunderstand Government|quotes=true}} | ||
