Difference between revisions of "Libertarians Misunderstand Property"
From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <!-- use some ideas from: http://robertnielsen21.wordpress.com/2014/03/22/why-taxation-is-not-theft --> | ||
[[Category:What Is Wrong With Libertarianism|500]] | [[Category:What Is Wrong With Libertarianism|500]] | ||
[[Category:Failures Of Libertarian Philosophy|100]] | [[Category:Failures Of Libertarian Philosophy|100]] | ||
Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
Libertarians routinely assume modern property is natural, is absolute, is costless, should extend over all, and solves all problems. None of that is true. | Libertarians routinely assume modern property is natural, is absolute, is costless, should extend over all, and solves all problems. None of that is true. | ||
− | Modern, liberal property is a human creation: it is not natural. Simpler forms of property are primordial, mere temporary holdings, probably dating to combat over precambrian mates, food sources, and nest sites. | + | Modern, liberal property (the right) is a human creation: it is not natural. Simpler forms of "property" are primordial, mere temporary holdings (liberties), probably dating to combat over precambrian mates, food sources, and nest sites. The [[Hohfeld’s_typology_of_rights|Hohfeldian]] point about liberties is how weak they are: anybody can interfere in them any way they want. If you have the liberty to hold something, anybody can take it away if they want. That's not a property right. When libertarians babble about animals and children understanding property, they are actually describing holdings: those same animals and children understand yielding the holding to the bigger animal or kid. |
Libertarian philosophers pretend that modern property predates government, when government creates modern property rights. Nozick does this, for example. | Libertarian philosophers pretend that modern property predates government, when government creates modern property rights. Nozick does this, for example. |