Difference between revisions of "Liberty And Freedom Are Amoral"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>The morality of any particular liberty or freedom must be decided independently.  Just because it is a liberty or freedom does not mean it is good.  For example, if I am free to punch you in the nose, is that good?  If I am free to radioactively contaminate my own land for thousands of years, is that good?  Arguments that these actions are not "real liberties or freedoms" have nothing to do with reality: they are simply attempts to redefine common words to fit ideology (see [[newspeak]].)</noinclude><includeonly>
+
<includeonly>The morality of any particular liberty or freedom must be decided independently.  Just because it is a liberty or freedom does not mean it is good.  For example, if I am free to punch you in the nose, is that good?  If I am free to radioactively contaminate my own land for thousands of years, is that good?  Arguments that these actions are not "real liberties or freedoms" have nothing to do with reality: they are simply attempts to redefine common words to fit ideology (see [[newspeak]].)</includeonly><noinclude>
  
 
additional text
 
additional text
  
 
[[Category:What Is Wrong With Libertarianism 2|600]]
 
[[Category:What Is Wrong With Libertarianism 2|600]]

Revision as of 18:25, 16 August 2010