Difference between revisions of "Misunderstanding Of Unions"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'Simple, the governmnt does not force anyone to join a labor union. The requirment for labor union membership in order to work at an employer is a requirment negeoiated between t…')
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Simple, the governmnt does not force anyone to join a labor union.  The
+
[[Category:Under Construction]]
requirment for labor union membership in order to work at an employer is
+
 
a requirment negeoiated between the employer and a labor union.
+
Simple, the government does not force anyone to join a labor union.  The
Government jobs that have this negeoiated requirment are just the same as
+
requirement for labor union membership in order to work at an employer is
 +
a requirement negotiated between the employer and a labor union.
 +
Government jobs that have this negotiated requirement are just the same as
 
private industry jobs.
 
private industry jobs.
 
Point out to the Libertarian that the contract must he honored and how
 
Point out to the Libertarian that the contract must he honored and how
Line 10: Line 12:
 
non-union workers.  Then  call the Libertarian and UN-Libertarian
 
non-union workers.  Then  call the Libertarian and UN-Libertarian
 
thinker.
 
thinker.
 +
 +
"Lloyd Miller" <lloyd@a-albionic.com> wrote:
 +
    Real, existing Labor Unions are not free associations.  They are based
 +
    on government privileges passed in the 1930's and formalized via the
 +
    National Labor Relations Board...  Of course, truly voluntary labor
 +
    unions would be ok according to libertarianism.
 +
Neither are corporations free associations.  They too are based on government
 +
privileges, originally based on state charters, and later greatly expanded
 +
by the federal government.
 +
If the LP is silent about government sponsorship of unions for fear of
 +
offending workers, imagine how much more they must fear offending
 +
corporations.
 +
 +
Corporate law enforces a complicated relationship
 +
between the Corporation, Shareholders, Directors, Managers (and other
 +
Employees), and external Transactors (such as suppliers and customers.)
 +
External transactors MUST operate through the CORPORATION.  They cannot
 +
legally operate through the component agents of the corporation.
 +
The same is true of UNIONS.  Employers MUST negotiate through the unions,
 +
not through the individual members.  There is no difference in the legal special
 +
privilege: in either case, you are required to operate through the
 +
organization, not the individual.
 +
 +
countervailing power: a Galbraith idea in:
 +
American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power
 +
unions, minimum wage, and other practices to make markets less callous and
 +
better serve the needs of the majority
 +
 +
Corporations are every bit as much government constructs as unions. It's obvious CATO is a corporatist shill, otherwise it would be denouncing corporations as vehemently as it denounces unions.
 +
 +
"Studies of unionization provide evidence that, on the whole, unionized
 +
companies have higher labor productivity than non-unionized companies
 +
(except, of course, when the union is on strike!) This is a surprising
 +
result, and there has been some controversy about how to explain it.
 +
One possible explanation is that the higher productivity comes from the
 +
productivity effect of better wages (and working conditions) the unions
 +
were able to obtain. The productivity effect does not seem to increase
 +
profits in this case, however. Apparently the increase in productivity
 +
is just about balanced out by the increase in wages."
 +
http://william-king.www.drexel.edu/top/prin/txt/factors/crits5.html
 +
McCain on unions and salaries and productivity.
 +
        What this means is that from a macroeconomic perspective, unions are
 +
        quite beneficial, and worth promoting to increase the productivity of
 +
        society.

Latest revision as of 21:27, 9 April 2016