Difference between revisions of "Misunderstanding Of Unions"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'Simple, the governmnt does not force anyone to join a labor union. The requirment for labor union membership in order to work at an employer is a requirment negeoiated between t…')
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
non-union workers.  Then  call the Libertarian and UN-Libertarian
 
non-union workers.  Then  call the Libertarian and UN-Libertarian
 
thinker.
 
thinker.
 +
 +
"Lloyd Miller" <lloyd@a-albionic.com> wrote:
 +
    Real, existing Labor Unions are not free associations.  They are based
 +
    on government privileges passed in the 1930's and formalized via the
 +
    National Labor Relations Board...  Of course, truly voluntary labor
 +
    unions would be ok according to libertarianism.
 +
Neither are corporations free associations.  They too are based on government
 +
privileges, originally based on state charters, and later greatly expanded
 +
by the federal government.
 +
If the LP is silent about government sponsorship of unions for fear of
 +
offending workers, imagine how much more they must fear offending
 +
corporations.
 +
 +
Corporate law enforces a complicated relationship
 +
between the Corporation, Shareholders, Directors, Managers (and other
 +
Employees), and external Transactors (such as suppliers and customers.)
 +
External transactors MUST operate through the CORPORATION.  They cannot
 +
legally operate through the component agents of the corporation.
 +
The same is true of UNIONS.  Employers MUST negotiate through the unions,
 +
not through the individual members.  There is no difference in the legal special
 +
privilege: in either case, you are required to operate through the
 +
organization, not the individual.
 +
 +
countervailing power: a Galbraith idea in:
 +
American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power
 +
unions, minimum wage, and other practices to make markets less callous and
 +
better serve the needs of the majority
 +
 +
Corporations are every bit as much government constructs as unions. It's obvious CATO is a corporatist shill, otherwise it would be denouncing corporations as vehemently as it denounces unions.
 +
 +
"Studies of unionization provide evidence that, on the whole, unionized
 +
companies have higher labor productivity than non-unionized companies
 +
(except, of course, when the union is on strike!) This is a surprising
 +
result, and there has been some controversy about how to explain it.
 +
One possible explanation is that the higher productivity comes from the
 +
productivity effect of better wages (and working conditions) the unions
 +
were able to obtain. The productivity effect does not seem to increase
 +
profits in this case, however. Apparently the increase in productivity
 +
is just about balanced out by the increase in wages."
 +
http://william-king.www.drexel.edu/top/prin/txt/factors/crits5.html
 +
McCain on unions and salaries and productivity.
 +
        What this means is that from a macroeconomic perspective, unions are
 +
        quite beneficial, and worth promoting to increase the productivity of
 +
        society.

Revision as of 13:50, 16 October 2009