Difference between revisions of "Musical Chairs Theory Of Economic Justice"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
Libertarian economic justice has no problem with the game of musical chairs.  The winner "obviously" earns that final seat through competition following the rules of the game.  The losers also deserve their losses according to the rules of the game.
 
Libertarian economic justice has no problem with the game of musical chairs.  The winner "obviously" earns that final seat through competition following the rules of the game.  The losers also deserve their losses according to the rules of the game.
  
First, the payoff system in musical chairs is winner takes all.  This is an important real world model, that children should learn about.  But the converse lesson is that there are many losers and only one chair is left of the original number.  A game designed to have more winners or no complete losers might be less exciting, but a better outcome.  For example, a winner might get to sit across two seats, and a two losers would share one set.  Nobody is "out", and no chairs are removed.
+
First, the payoff system in musical chairs is winner takes all.  This is an important real world model, that children should learn about.  But the converse lesson is that there are many losers and only one chair is left of the original number.  A game designed to have more winners or no complete losers might be less exciting, but a better outcome.  For example, a winner might get to sit across two seats, and a two losers would share one seat.  Nobody is "out", and no chairs are removed.
  
 
The real world lesson from the musical chairs payoff system is that we can design society to concentrate rewards to a few people, or disperse them among many.
 
The real world lesson from the musical chairs payoff system is that we can design society to concentrate rewards to a few people, or disperse them among many.
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
In the real world, we prohibit certain wasteful, non-productive competitions.  Competition for property through theft and violence, for example.  In various religious communities, competition for status through conspicuous consumption is prohibited by requirements for plain dress.  Etc.
 
In the real world, we prohibit certain wasteful, non-productive competitions.  Competition for property through theft and violence, for example.  In various religious communities, competition for status through conspicuous consumption is prohibited by requirements for plain dress.  Etc.
 
No matter how loudly Horatio Alger is invoked, there still will be only one
 
winner of a game of musical chairs, and many losers.
 
Likewise, no matter how responsably the players attempt to act, only one will
 
finish in a chair.
 
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- otherwise, we would use {{Links}} and {{Quotes}}  -->
 
<!-- otherwise, we would use {{Links}} and {{Quotes}}  -->
 
{{List|title=Musical Chairs Theory Of Economic Justice|links=true}}
 
{{List|title=Musical Chairs Theory Of Economic Justice|links=true}}
 
{{Quotations|title=Musical Chairs Theory Of Economic Justice|quotes=true}}
 
{{Quotations|title=Musical Chairs Theory Of Economic Justice|quotes=true}}

Revision as of 13:35, 26 January 2019