Difference between revisions of "Non-Aggression"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
The "non-aggression axiom" is also a glib way of ignoring problems of [[risk]] and [[externalities]].
 
The "non-aggression axiom" is also a glib way of ignoring problems of [[risk]] and [[externalities]].
 +
 +
The NAP is sometimes presented as: "Don’t hit people, don’t take their stuff. The basic rule of all civilized societies." That may work for Sesame Street, but falls apart as soon as you consider "retaliatory force" and begin to ask why it is their stuff.  The whole basic principle of private property in "civilized societies" is "we have stolen this stuff from the commons and will hit you if you disagree."
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- normally, we would use {{Links}} and {{Quotes}}  -->
 
<!-- normally, we would use {{Links}} and {{Quotes}}  -->
 
{{List|Non-Aggression|links=true}}
 
{{List|Non-Aggression|links=true}}
 
{{Quotations|Non-Aggression|quotes=true}}
 
{{Quotations|Non-Aggression|quotes=true}}

Revision as of 17:45, 4 June 2020