Difference between revisions of "Non-Aggression"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
The "non-aggression axiom" specifically exempts use of force to punish or deter violators of rights claims, calling it "retaliatory".  In other words, they say it's not coercive only because they are in favor of it.  Sorry, aiming guns at people is coercive no matter what your justification.
 
The "non-aggression axiom" specifically exempts use of force to punish or deter violators of rights claims, calling it "retaliatory".  In other words, they say it's not coercive only because they are in favor of it.  Sorry, aiming guns at people is coercive no matter what your justification.
  
The "non-aggression axiom" is also a glib way of ignoring problems of [[risk]] or [[externalities]].
+
The "non-aggression axiom" is also a glib way of ignoring problems of [[risk]] and [[externalities]].
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- normally, we would use {{Links}} and {{Quotes}}  -->
 
<!-- normally, we would use {{Links}} and {{Quotes}}  -->
 
{{List|Non-Aggression|links=true}}
 
{{List|Non-Aggression|links=true}}
 
{{Quotations|Non-Aggression|quotes=true}}
 
{{Quotations|Non-Aggression|quotes=true}}

Revision as of 19:48, 6 April 2019