Difference between revisions of "Notes"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 16: Line 16:
 
http://www.eea-esem.com/files/papers/EEA-ESEM/2009/1277/Bis-Sie_party-competition_10.pdf
 
http://www.eea-esem.com/files/papers/EEA-ESEM/2009/1277/Bis-Sie_party-competition_10.pdf
 
http://www.sas.upenn.edu/ppe/documents/Landemore_DemocraticReason_Article_Version_for_UPenn.pdf
 
http://www.sas.upenn.edu/ppe/documents/Landemore_DemocraticReason_Article_Version_for_UPenn.pdf
 +
http://www.smartdemocracy.com/papers/landemore_democratic_reason.2008.pdf
 +
"Adrian Vermeule (REF this volume) and others consider the CJT a mere variant of the Miracle of
 +
Aggregation. This might well be the case (in which case the CJT would probably correspond to what I call the
 +
“democratic” version of the miracle of aggregation) but to the extent that the relevant literature still treats them
 +
separately, I will address each account as autonomous. "
 +
http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/11/16/bryan-caplan/reply-to-my-critics/
 +
"There are plenty of areas where the Miracle of Aggregation probably works as advertised."

Revision as of 12:33, 1 April 2011