Difference between revisions of "Notes"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Editing]]    [[Testing]]    [[Examples]]  [[:Category:Unfinished|Unfinished]]  [[:Category:Uncategorized|Uncategorized]]
+
== Implementation Tricks==
 +
Producing indexes using categories is simple, but had several ugly drawbacks:
 +
* Their titles all start with "Category:".
 +
* Categories tend to be single level.
 +
* Categories do not let you add extra information beyond the title of a page.
 +
* Categories do not let you mix wiki pages with external links.
  
examine where I should be using <pre><blockquote></pre>
+
Making manual indexes means that if you want to link something twice in different indexes, you have to copy the link and description each place.  Hard to maintain!
 +
 
 +
I solved these problems with several tricks.
 +
* [[:Template:DES]] which allows me to associate descriptions with each page.
 +
* Index templates [[:Template:List]] and [[:Template:Quotations]].  These let me list categories with DPL and display descriptions with each page.  If a page is for an external link, that link is used rather than the internal wiki link.
 +
* A one-line hack to the mediawiki OutputPage.php code that makes the categories links at the bottom of each page go directly to a main namespace page instead of a category namespace page.  Switch <code>$title = Title::makeTitleSafe( NS_CATEGORY, $category );</code> to use <code>NS_MAIN</code>.  Thus, no sending people to category pages or having category pages redirect to regular pages.  You can still go to Category pages directly.
 +
 
 +
== Other Notes ==
 +
 
 +
examine where I should be using <pre><blockquote></pre>j
  
 
Things to fix:
 
Things to fix:
* a way of showing categories with descriptions
 
 
* eliminate showing structural categories such as URL and Description
 
* eliminate showing structural categories such as URL and Description
 
* generation of book pages
 
* generation of book pages
* editing links for when logged in
 
* link to blog
 
 
* main page choices at top
 
* main page choices at top
 
 
 
The Rise and Fall of the College Graduate Wage Premium
 
http://www.nber.org/digest/jan08/w12984.html
 
one of the reasons why college costs may be increasing
 
 
http://www.slowpokecomics.com/strips/marketcult.html
 
 
http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2009/01/02/tyler-cowen-statist-anti-rothbardian-agent-of-the-kochtopus/
 
 
But the Koch brothers’ aims aren’t so low. They have been and will continue to try and shape the dominant political culture – to make it more corporate-friendly, more conservative, and more solicitous of their ideas. From the media to Congress, their goal is to ensure a full airing of their messages and a locking out of anyone else’s. They don’t play a game of election to election; they play a longer game. And even when their politicians fail and the Democrats get into power, they feel they can still win even when losing. The trajectory of what passes for “progressive” and “conservative” in the last 30 years should prove their success.
 
 
[http://www.bostonreview.net/BR36.2/glennerster_kremer_behavioral_economics_global_development.php Small Changes, Big Results For The World's Poor - Boston Review]
 
 
It is important to note that cost savings come from creating competition rather than from privatization per se–substituting a private monopoly for a public one is not very helpful but creating and maintaining a competitive environment can work wonders. [http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2011/03/trash-talk.html Alex Tabarrok]
 
 
Can financial sector profits create deadweight losses the way taxation does?
 
http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/03/30/chart-of-the-day-us-financial-profits/
 
 
http://www.eea-esem.com/files/papers/EEA-ESEM/2009/1277/Bis-Sie_party-competition_10.pdf
 
http://www.sas.upenn.edu/ppe/documents/Landemore_DemocraticReason_Article_Version_for_UPenn.pdf
 
http://www.smartdemocracy.com/papers/landemore_democratic_reason.2008.pdf
 
"Adrian Vermeule (REF this volume) and others consider the CJT a mere variant of the Miracle of
 
Aggregation. This might well be the case (in which case the CJT would probably correspond to what I call the
 
“democratic” version of the miracle of aggregation) but to the extent that the relevant literature still treats them
 
separately, I will address each account as autonomous. "
 
http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/11/16/bryan-caplan/reply-to-my-critics/
 
"There are plenty of areas where the Miracle of Aggregation probably works as advertised."
 
http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/11/06/bryan-caplan/the-myth-of-the-rational-voter/
 
"Do voters know what they’re doing? According to the typical economist — and many political scientists — the answer is “No, but it doesn’t matter.” How could it not matter? The main argument is that the public’s errors cancel out.[1]"
 
See Wittman to see if that is the main argument.
 
It can't be, because information theory says we cannot represent all the information in one bit.  Thus, Caplan is entirely mistaken in his thesis.  The real answer is that there is a feedback loop, with voting as the amplifier.  This makes politicians move towards positions desired by voters.  Some may want to characterize those positions as correct, but the real answer is that there is no blatant incorrectness to the voters perceptions.  Different than initiative or referendum.
 
"reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions,"  David Hume
 

Revision as of 18:25, 25 January 2014