Difference between revisions of "Parable of the ship: why Austrian Economics fails."

Revision as of 01:10, 18 October 2012 (view source) Mhuben (Talk \| contribs) (Created page with "<!-- you can have any number of categories here --> Category:Mike Huben Category:Austrian Economics Category:Philosophy {{DES \| des = The great fault of Austrianism i...")		Revision as of 13:25, 27 January 2013 (view source) Mhuben (Talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 24:		Line 24:
	This is not a new position: it is basic to science and ought to be basic to philosophy. Hume said it very clearly 260 years ago:		This is not a new position: it is basic to science and ought to be basic to philosophy. Hume said it very clearly 260 years ago:

−	{{:Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding/flames}}	+	{{QuoteOne\|Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding/flames}}

Revision as of 13:25, 27 January 2013