Difference between revisions of "Polycentric Law"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[Category:Law]]
 
[[Category:Law]]
 
[[Category:Ideas Libertarians Do Not Own]]
 
[[Category:Ideas Libertarians Do Not Own]]
 +
[[Category:Reinventing Government Badly]]
 
{{DES | des = Non-monopolistic, competing law.  We actually already have that in the USA, with federal, state, and local law plus local authorities and commonlaw. It may also include private law.  Some libertarian academics have made careers describing other, rare or ephemeral historical examples. The big problem is preventing conflict over whose law prevails: this can be solved either with simple dominance or with division of responsibility.  This is not a libertarian idea. | show=}}
 
{{DES | des = Non-monopolistic, competing law.  We actually already have that in the USA, with federal, state, and local law plus local authorities and commonlaw. It may also include private law.  Some libertarian academics have made careers describing other, rare or ephemeral historical examples. The big problem is preventing conflict over whose law prevails: this can be solved either with simple dominance or with division of responsibility.  This is not a libertarian idea. | show=}}
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->

Latest revision as of 19:29, 25 October 2017