Difference between revisions of "Private Property as Violence: Why Proprietarian Systems are Incompatible with the Non-Aggression Principle/liberty"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
{{Quote
 
{{Quote
 
| text = First, private property really isn’t necessary to facilitate liberty. How can we be certain of this? Because it has been conclusively demonstrated through excellent research. As one example, Elinor Ostrom’s work on common pool resource management that has arisen organically around the world definitively disproves the underlying assumption that a tragedy of the commons will always occur without private property rights. Instead, Ostrom documents a set of guiding design principles that allow cooperative, self-managing folks to utilizes shared resources without ownership.
 
| text = First, private property really isn’t necessary to facilitate liberty. How can we be certain of this? Because it has been conclusively demonstrated through excellent research. As one example, Elinor Ostrom’s work on common pool resource management that has arisen organically around the world definitively disproves the underlying assumption that a tragedy of the commons will always occur without private property rights. Instead, Ostrom documents a set of guiding design principles that allow cooperative, self-managing folks to utilizes shared resources without ownership.
| cite = [[David Golumbia]], "{{Link |Cryptocurrency Is Garbage. So Is Blockchain.}}"
+
| cite = [[T.Collins Logan]], "{{Link |Private Property as Violence: Why Proprietarian Systems are Incompatible with the Non-Aggression Principle}}"
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 23:02, 2 August 2021