Difference between revisions of "Rand's work: style and quality/differentiates"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[Category:Critiques Of Libertarianism]]
 
[[Category:Critiques Of Libertarianism]]
 
[[Category:Failures Of Libertarian Philosophy]]
 
[[Category:Failures Of Libertarian Philosophy]]
 +
[[Category:Objectivism]]
 
{{Quote
 
{{Quote
 
| text = So what is it that differentiates the writing of Rand from those of classic academics and professional philosophers? It is simply that her work has every appearance of an extended and multi-faceted straw man argument that fails to meet even the minimum standards of scholarship. It has all the marks of what in science would be pseudo-science. If there is such a thing as pseudo-philosophy, this is it.
 
| text = So what is it that differentiates the writing of Rand from those of classic academics and professional philosophers? It is simply that her work has every appearance of an extended and multi-faceted straw man argument that fails to meet even the minimum standards of scholarship. It has all the marks of what in science would be pseudo-science. If there is such a thing as pseudo-philosophy, this is it.
 
| cite = [[Gary Merrill]], "{{Link |Rand's work: style and quality}}"
 
| cite = [[Gary Merrill]], "{{Link |Rand's work: style and quality}}"
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 15:44, 20 December 2017