Difference between revisions of "Revisiting the labour admixture theory as foundation of the institution of private property"
From Critiques Of Libertarianism
(Created page with "<!-- you can have any number of categories here --> Category:Matthias Neumann 200 <!-- 1 URL must be followed by >= 0...") |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<!-- {{Old URL | url = }} --> | <!-- {{Old URL | url = }} --> | ||
{{End URL}} | {{End URL}} | ||
| − | {{DES | des = A very nice review of the problems of Locke, Nozick and Rothbard in defining how "mixing" works. "This paper reveals substantialistic, idealistic and teleological foundations of the admixture theory and discusses their problems. A categorical mistake at the heart of the argument concerning the difference of the substances of labour and land is analyzed. Historical queries with the Lockean proviso that „enough and as good” must be left in common for others in the process of appropriation, and contemporary contributions in this field by Robert Nozick and Murray Rothbard are discussed. | + | {{DES | des = A very nice review of the problems of Locke, Nozick and Rothbard in defining how "mixing" works. "This paper reveals substantialistic, idealistic and teleological foundations of the admixture theory and discusses their problems. A categorical mistake at the heart of the argument concerning the difference of the substances of labour and land is analyzed. Historical queries with the Lockean proviso that „enough and as good” must be left in common for others in the process of appropriation, and contemporary contributions in this field by Robert Nozick and Murray Rothbard are discussed. Altogether, internal frictions of the admixture theory and problems with the historical breach of its constraints on appropriation are quite substantial. In conclusion, the admixture theory fails to justify the institution of private property in land." | show=}} |
| − | Altogether, internal frictions of the admixture theory and problems with the historical breach of its constraints on appropriation are quite substantial. In conclusion, the admixture theory fails to justify the institution of private property in land." | show=}} | + | |
<!-- insert wiki page text here --> | <!-- insert wiki page text here --> | ||
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them. Use these explicit workarounds. --> | <!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them. Use these explicit workarounds. --> | ||
