Difference between revisions of "Socialist Calculation Debate"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<!-- you can have any number of categories here -->
 
<!-- you can have any number of categories here -->
 
[[Category:Austrian Economics]]
 
[[Category:Austrian Economics]]
[[Category: Ludwig von Mises]]
+
[[Category:Central Planning]]
[[Category: Friedrich von Hayek]]
+
[[Category:Ludwig von Mises]]
 +
[[Category:Friedrich von Hayek]]
 
{{DES | des = A debate about how a socialist economy would be able to allocate resources between goals without resort to capitalism.  The debate tends to ignore the fact that Communist and wartime command economies did very well with centralized planning.  Not to mention Walmart. This is a zombie issue: it was decisively settled by the idea of market socialism (now instantiated as [[Social Wealth Funds]]) because markets are not exclusive to capitalism. | show=}}
 
{{DES | des = A debate about how a socialist economy would be able to allocate resources between goals without resort to capitalism.  The debate tends to ignore the fact that Communist and wartime command economies did very well with centralized planning.  Not to mention Walmart. This is a zombie issue: it was decisively settled by the idea of market socialism (now instantiated as [[Social Wealth Funds]]) because markets are not exclusive to capitalism. | show=}}
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->
 
<!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them.  Use these explicit workarounds. -->

Revision as of 19:45, 6 May 2020