From Critiques Of Libertarianism

← Squeezing the rich is good: even when it raises no money/full

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

---

You can view and copy the source of this page:

<!-- you can have any number of categories here --> [[Category:Chris Bertram]] [[Category:Libertarians Misunderstand Property]] [[Category:Taxes]] [[Category:Inequality]] [[Category:Libertarian Dismissals Of Inequality]] [[Category:Class War]] [[Category:Failures Of Libertarian Philosophy]] [[Category:Non-Aggression]] {{Quote | text = [...] the idea that people have full liberal property rights in their pre-tax income is unwarranted. They participate in a co-operative venture with others in society subject to certain conditions, and those conditions include one that part of “their income” already belongs to the wider society, via the state. This point, hated by libertarians, defeats the widespread view that people are having “their money” taken off them: it wasn’t theirs to start with. | cite = [[Chris Bertram]], "{{Link |Squeezing the rich is good: even when it raises no money}}" }}

Return to Squeezing the rich is good: even when it raises no money/full.