Difference between revisions of "The Elasticity of Demand With Respect to Product Failures; or Why the Market for Quack Medicines Flourished for More Than 150 Years"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "<!-- you can have any number of categories here --> Category:Werner Troesken Category:Capitalist Harms Category:Private Sector Waste [[Category:Unregulated Market]...")
 
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
[[Category:Food and Drug Administration]]
 
[[Category:Food and Drug Administration]]
 
[[Category:Health Care]]
 
[[Category:Health Care]]
 +
[[Category:Alternative Medicine Fraud]]
 
[[Category:Deregulation]]
 
[[Category:Deregulation]]
 
[[Category:Market Failure]]
 
[[Category:Market Failure]]
Line 13: Line 14:
 
[[Category: Science Denialists]]
 
[[Category: Science Denialists]]
 
<!-- 1 URL must be followed by >= 0 Other URL and Old URL and 1 End URL.-->
 
<!-- 1 URL must be followed by >= 0 Other URL and Old URL and 1 End URL.-->
{{URL | url = http://cid.bcrp.gob.pe/biblio/Papers/NBER/2010/enero/w15699.pdf}}
+
{{URL | url = https://www.nber.org/papers/w15699.pdf}}
 
<!-- {{Other URL | url = }} -->
 
<!-- {{Other URL | url = }} -->
 
<!-- {{Old URL | url = }} -->
 
<!-- {{Old URL | url = }} -->
 +
{{Old URL | url = http://cid.bcrp.gob.pe/biblio/Papers/NBER/2010/enero/w15699.pdf}}
 
{{End URL}}
 
{{End URL}}
 
{{DES | des = Markets did not punish the quack medicine industry due to unusually low elasticity of demand with respect to product failure and bounded rationality.  The conclusion mentions that recent resaerch shows the FDA increased consumer welfare.  | show=}}
 
{{DES | des = Markets did not punish the quack medicine industry due to unusually low elasticity of demand with respect to product failure and bounded rationality.  The conclusion mentions that recent resaerch shows the FDA increased consumer welfare.  | show=}}

Latest revision as of 12:56, 28 April 2019