Difference between revisions of "The Entitlement Theory of Justice"
From Critiques Of Libertarianism
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Category:Huben on Nozick]] | [[Category:Huben on Nozick]] | ||
{{DES | des = Like most of Nozick's arguments in [[Anarchy, State and Utopia]], the strength of the Entitlement Theory of Justice is illusory. It suffers critically from a lack of foundations and vulnerability to simple counterexamples.}} | {{DES | des = Like most of Nozick's arguments in [[Anarchy, State and Utopia]], the strength of the Entitlement Theory of Justice is illusory. It suffers critically from a lack of foundations and vulnerability to simple counterexamples.}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Nozick's "Anarchy, State, and Utopia" was very influential, in part because | Nozick's "Anarchy, State, and Utopia" was very influential, in part because | ||
of the novelty and creativity of the arguments. One of the most striking | of the novelty and creativity of the arguments. One of the most striking | ||
