Difference between revisions of "The Prehistory of Private Property: Implications for Modern Political Theory"
From Critiques Of Libertarianism
(Created page with "{{Chicago | Chicago = Widerquist, Karl, and McCall, Grant. 2021. ''The Prehistory of Private Property: Implications for Modern Political...") |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[Category:Fallacies Of Philosophy]] | [[Category:Fallacies Of Philosophy]] | ||
[[Category:History]] | [[Category:History]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Anthropology and Scientific Psychology]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Historical Revisionism]] | ||
| + | [[Category:The Lockean Fable of Initial Acquisition]] | ||
{{Availability | isbn = 1474447422 | | | }} <!-- can place links to online versions between the bars --> | {{Availability | isbn = 1474447422 | | | }} <!-- can place links to online versions between the bars --> | ||
{{DES | des = "This book debunks three false claims commonly accepted by contemporary political philosophers regarding property systems: that inequality is natural, inevitable, or incompatible with freedom; that capitalism is more consistent with negative freedom than any other conceivable economic system; and that the normative principles of appropriation and voluntary transfer applied in the world in which we live support a capitalist system with strong, individualist and unequal private property rights. The authors review the history of the use and importance of these claims in philosophy, and use thorough anthropological and historical evidence to refute them." | show=}} | {{DES | des = "This book debunks three false claims commonly accepted by contemporary political philosophers regarding property systems: that inequality is natural, inevitable, or incompatible with freedom; that capitalism is more consistent with negative freedom than any other conceivable economic system; and that the normative principles of appropriation and voluntary transfer applied in the world in which we live support a capitalist system with strong, individualist and unequal private property rights. The authors review the history of the use and importance of these claims in philosophy, and use thorough anthropological and historical evidence to refute them." | show=}} | ||
