Difference between revisions of "The worthless Lockean Fable of Initial Acquisition"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
[[Category:Mike Huben]]
 
[[Category:Mike Huben]]
 
[[Category:Justice, Gender, And The Family]]
 
[[Category:Justice, Gender, And The Family]]
 +
[[Category:Homesteading]]
 
[[Category:The Lockean Fable of Initial Acquisition|100]]
 
[[Category:The Lockean Fable of Initial Acquisition|100]]
 
{{DES | des = The ahistorical labor theory of property fails in many ways.  Including ignoring the evidence in front of our noses.}}
 
{{DES | des = The ahistorical labor theory of property fails in many ways.  Including ignoring the evidence in front of our noses.}}
Line 56: Line 57:
 
The brief homesteading period in the US was a government method of giving away land it owned (stolen from the Amerinds), not spontaneous removal from a commons.  It resulted in government-recognized ownership, not a natural right.
 
The brief homesteading period in the US was a government method of giving away land it owned (stolen from the Amerinds), not spontaneous removal from a commons.  It resulted in government-recognized ownership, not a natural right.
  
 +
For more on this, see: [[Homesteading]].
 
=Alternative outcomes for the Lockean Fable =
 
=Alternative outcomes for the Lockean Fable =
 
==Georgism==
 
==Georgism==

Revision as of 01:53, 2 May 2018