Difference between revisions of "The worthless Lockean Fable of Initial Acquisition"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
I'm going to fisk John Locke.  Not because it is a great way to argue, but because there are so many assumptions and fallacies packed into just a few sentences.
 
I'm going to fisk John Locke.  Not because it is a great way to argue, but because there are so many assumptions and fallacies packed into just a few sentences.
 
== Though the earth, and all inferior creatures, be common to all men, ==
 
== Though the earth, and all inferior creatures, be common to all men, ==
This is a religious belief, founded in sacred texts.  It has no more force than a king's declaration that he is appointed by god to rule a land.
+
This is a religious belief, a particular interpretation of some sacred texts.  It has no more force than a king's declaration that he is appointed by god to rule a land.
 
== yet every man has a property in his own person: ==
 
== yet every man has a property in his own person: ==
Yet another unjustifiable natural rights dogma that certainly didn't hold in Locke's era of widespread slavery, monarchy, and patriarchy.  Property is a social construct, and no society of his time or ours treated people's bodies as their own property.  Locke does not explain or defend this view in any way: he merely expects us to nod our heads in agreement.
+
Yet another unjustifiable natural rights assertion that certainly didn't hold in Locke's era of widespread slavery, monarchy, and patriarchy.  Property is a social construct, and no society of his time or ours treated people's bodies as their own property: there were always major differences.  Locke does not explain or defend this view in any way: he merely expects us to nod our heads in agreement.
 
== this no body has any right to but himself.  ==
 
== this no body has any right to but himself.  ==
Excepting slaves, women, children, servants, employees, lower classes, prisoners, etc.  But let's say that this was aspirational, what he would like, as opposed to reality.
+
Excepting slaves, women, children, servants, employees, lower classes, prisoners, etc.  But perhaps this was aspirational, what he would like, as opposed to reality.
 
== The labour of his body, and the work of his hands, we may say, are properly his.  ==
 
== The labour of his body, and the work of his hands, we may say, are properly his.  ==
 
With the same exceptions, and the same merely aspirational nature.
 
With the same exceptions, and the same merely aspirational nature.
Line 23: Line 23:
 
* Making a trail through a forest.
 
* Making a trail through a forest.
 
* Burning undergrowth to make a forest better for game.
 
* Burning undergrowth to make a forest better for game.
* Timbering a forest.
+
* Clearing a forest by burning it.
 +
* Clearing a forest by timbering it.
 
* Grazing a cleared forest.
 
* Grazing a cleared forest.
 
* Fencing a cleared forest that is grazed.
 
* Fencing a cleared forest that is grazed.

Revision as of 23:48, 6 September 2014