Difference between revisions of "The worthless Lockean Fable of Initial Acquisition"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
[[Category:Justice, Gender, And The Family]]
 
[[Category:Justice, Gender, And The Family]]
 
[[Category:Homesteading]]
 
[[Category:Homesteading]]
 +
[[Category:Framing]]
 
[[Category:The Lockean Fable of Initial Acquisition|100]]
 
[[Category:The Lockean Fable of Initial Acquisition|100]]
 
{{DES | des = The ahistorical labor theory of property fails in many ways.  Including ignoring the evidence in front of our noses.}}
 
{{DES | des = The ahistorical labor theory of property fails in many ways.  Including ignoring the evidence in front of our noses.}}
Line 8: Line 9:
 
{{Under Construction}}
 
{{Under Construction}}
 
=The parts of the fable.=
 
=The parts of the fable.=
I'm going to fisk John Locke.  Not because it is a great way to argue, but because there are so many assumptions and fallacies packed into just a few sentences.
+
I'm going to fisk John Locke.  Not because it is a great way to argue, but because there are so many frames, assumptions and fallacies packed into just a few sentences.
 
== Though the earth, and all inferior creatures, be common to all men, ==
 
== Though the earth, and all inferior creatures, be common to all men, ==
 
This is a religious belief, a particular interpretation of some sacred texts.  It has no more force than a king's declaration that he is appointed by god to rule a land.
 
This is a religious belief, a particular interpretation of some sacred texts.  It has no more force than a king's declaration that he is appointed by god to rule a land.

Latest revision as of 13:15, 5 November 2020