Difference between revisions of "Thomas Paine’s “Agrarian Justice” and the Origins of Social Insurance/Agrarian Justice"
From Critiques Of Libertarianism
(Created page with "<!-- you can have any number of categories here --> Category:Elizabeth Anderson Category:Thomas Paine Category:Social Contract Category:Social Security {{Quote | ...") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[Category:Social Contract]] | [[Category:Social Contract]] | ||
[[Category:Social Security]] | [[Category:Social Security]] | ||
| + | [[Category:A Theory of Justice]] | ||
| + | [[Category:John Rawls]] | ||
{{Quote | {{Quote | ||
| text = "Agrarian Justice" forged a path to this modern, systemic understanding of justice. In it, Paine envisioned justice as requiring that the lowest rung be above poverty level. He recognized that achieving this required forging novel, positive (legal) forms of property rights--social insurance and stakeholder grants--that could not be deduced from local or "natural" principles of justice. He saw, if only partially, the limitations of market- and desert-based justifications of property rights that ignore social externalities. Most astonishingly, he stood at the cusp of a famous systemic principle of equality--a principle defining the limits of justified inequality. In the words of its most influential advocate, John Rawls, "social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are . . . reasonably expected to be to everyone's advantage." | | text = "Agrarian Justice" forged a path to this modern, systemic understanding of justice. In it, Paine envisioned justice as requiring that the lowest rung be above poverty level. He recognized that achieving this required forging novel, positive (legal) forms of property rights--social insurance and stakeholder grants--that could not be deduced from local or "natural" principles of justice. He saw, if only partially, the limitations of market- and desert-based justifications of property rights that ignore social externalities. Most astonishingly, he stood at the cusp of a famous systemic principle of equality--a principle defining the limits of justified inequality. In the words of its most influential advocate, John Rawls, "social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are . . . reasonably expected to be to everyone's advantage." | ||
| cite = [[Elizabeth Anderson]], "{{Link |Thomas Paine’s “Agrarian Justice” and the Origins of Social Insurance}}" | | cite = [[Elizabeth Anderson]], "{{Link |Thomas Paine’s “Agrarian Justice” and the Origins of Social Insurance}}" | ||
}} | }} | ||
