Difference between revisions of "What's Wrong With Libertarianism"
From Critiques Of Libertarianism
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Libertarian Admissions]] | [[Category:Libertarian Admissions]] | ||
<!-- 1 URL must be followed by >= 0 Other URL and Old URL and 1 End URL.--> | <!-- 1 URL must be followed by >= 0 Other URL and Old URL and 1 End URL.--> | ||
| − | {{URL | url = | + | {{URL | url = https://www.academia.edu/2428588/Whats_Wrong_with_Libertarianism_1997_}} |
<!-- {{Other URL | url = }} --> | <!-- {{Other URL | url = }} --> | ||
<!-- {{Old URL | url = }} --> | <!-- {{Old URL | url = }} --> | ||
| + | {{Old URL | url = http://www.criticalreview.com/crf/jf/11%203%20libertarianism.pdf}} | ||
{{End URL}} | {{End URL}} | ||
{{DES | des = Jeffrey Friedman, editor of [[Critical Review]]. thoroughly skewers four books on libertarianism. "Libertarian arguments about the empirical benefits of capitalism are, as yet, Inadequate to convince anyone who lacks libertarian philosophical convictions. Yet ‘philosophical’ libertarianism founders on internal contradictions that render it unfit to make libertarians out of anyone who does not have strong consequentialist reasons for libertarian belief. The joint failure of these two approaches to libertarianism explains why they are both present in orthodox libertarianism -- they hide each other’s weaknesses, thereby perpetuating them." Reviewed: ''[[Libertarianism, A Primer]]'', by [[David Boaz]]; ''[[Classical Liberalism: The Unvanquished Ideal]]'', by [[David Conway]]; ''[[What It Means to Be a Libertarian]]'', by [[Charles Murray]]; ''[[Bringing the Market Back In]]'', by [[John Kelley]].| show=}} | {{DES | des = Jeffrey Friedman, editor of [[Critical Review]]. thoroughly skewers four books on libertarianism. "Libertarian arguments about the empirical benefits of capitalism are, as yet, Inadequate to convince anyone who lacks libertarian philosophical convictions. Yet ‘philosophical’ libertarianism founders on internal contradictions that render it unfit to make libertarians out of anyone who does not have strong consequentialist reasons for libertarian belief. The joint failure of these two approaches to libertarianism explains why they are both present in orthodox libertarianism -- they hide each other’s weaknesses, thereby perpetuating them." Reviewed: ''[[Libertarianism, A Primer]]'', by [[David Boaz]]; ''[[Classical Liberalism: The Unvanquished Ideal]]'', by [[David Conway]]; ''[[What It Means to Be a Libertarian]]'', by [[Charles Murray]]; ''[[Bringing the Market Back In]]'', by [[John Kelley]].| show=}} | ||
