View source for What's Wrong With Libertarianism/coercion

<!-- you can have any number of categories here -->
[[Category:Jeffrey Friedman]]
[[Category:Coercion]]
[[Category:Liberty]]
[[Category:Failures Of Libertarian Philosophy]]
[[Category:What Is Wrong With Libertarianism]]
[[Category:Libertarians Criticizing Each Other]]
[[Category:Libertarian Admissions]]
{{Quote
| text = ... all legal systems, including libertarianism, coercively enforce rules that assign the “ownership” of all persons and all bits of the world. Every legal system throws a net of coercion over the entire society it covers, prohibiting by force any deviations from its definitions of rights. Inasmuch as there is just as much of the world to be parcelled out under each system’s set of property rules, and the rights governing all of this property are just as coercively enforced in all systems, there is no difference in the “amount” of coercion -- or, conversely, the amount of (negative) freedom -- under different legal systems, including libertarianism... So, strictly in terms of negative liberty -- freedom from physical coercion -- libertarianism has no edge over any other system.
| cite = [[Jeffrey Friedman]], "{{Link |What's Wrong With Libertarianism}}"
}}