Difference between revisions of "What Is Libertarianism?"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
(A Rhetoric Of Liberty)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
It's obvious that definitions of libertarianism by opponents are prone to bias.  By the same standard, self-serving definitions by  proponents are also prone to bias.  The simple solution is to present multiple viewpoints, each true to some degree, to construct a picture of the whole.  The story of [[The Blind Men and the Elephant]] illustrates how ridiculous clinging to a single viewpoint can be, and how building a more realistic picture would require critical acceptance of multiple viewpoints.  Viewpoints of proponents of libertarianism are well known; here are some viewpoints of opponents.
 
It's obvious that definitions of libertarianism by opponents are prone to bias.  By the same standard, self-serving definitions by  proponents are also prone to bias.  The simple solution is to present multiple viewpoints, each true to some degree, to construct a picture of the whole.  The story of [[The Blind Men and the Elephant]] illustrates how ridiculous clinging to a single viewpoint can be, and how building a more realistic picture would require critical acceptance of multiple viewpoints.  Viewpoints of proponents of libertarianism are well known; here are some viewpoints of opponents.
 
== A Rhetoric Of Liberty ==
 
== A Rhetoric Of Liberty ==
Libertarianism is united only by a rhetoric of liberty.  Liberty is the central
+
Libertarianism is united only by a rhetoric of liberty.  "Liberty" is the central glittering generality of libertarian propaganda.
glittering generality of their propaganda.  Liberty is vague
+
 
enough to justify any atrocity.  We routinely see libertarians living up to
+
Who can reject "liberty"? That makes it a powerful rhetorical tool; as long as you don't start getting specific.  Different people have different ideas of liberty, and can divide over those issues.  The defense against attempts to get specific is "equal liberty", but that rhetoric also begs important questions.  We all might have equal liberty to kill each other, but do we want such liberty?
Barry Goldwater's "extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice."
+
 
It's not even the same liberty to all of them.
+
"Liberty" unspecified is vague enough to justify any atrocity.  We routinely see libertarians promoting Barry Goldwater's "extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice." In the name of liberty, John Galt plans genocides dwarfing those of Communist states in "Atlas Shrugged".  In actual history, liberty to own slaves was a frequent claim.  Liberty to head your own family and religious liberty excused beating wives and disobedient children, sometimes fatally.
 +
 
 +
"Liberty" is the rhetorical tool of choice that unites libertarians: it can back any claim they make, no matter how bizarre. Libertarians have no single claim in common except this rhetoric, and they can gloss over their conflicting beliefs through the persuasion of their own rhetoric of liberty.
 +
 
 
== A Rightwing Populist Movement In Miniature ==
 
== A Rightwing Populist Movement In Miniature ==
 
While libertarians may profess socially left ideas such as freedom of choice, their right-conservatism becomes obvious if you ask them what parts of the right-wing economic agenda they'd be willing to sacrifice to realize their left social goals. They just won't give up their opposition to government and taxation, nor will they give up their allegiance to absolute property. No matter what social goals you propose in exchange. (This is a generalization -- of course some individual exceptions occur.)
 
While libertarians may profess socially left ideas such as freedom of choice, their right-conservatism becomes obvious if you ask them what parts of the right-wing economic agenda they'd be willing to sacrifice to realize their left social goals. They just won't give up their opposition to government and taxation, nor will they give up their allegiance to absolute property. No matter what social goals you propose in exchange. (This is a generalization -- of course some individual exceptions occur.)

Revision as of 12:03, 9 October 2010