Difference between revisions of "What Is Property?"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 42: Line 42:
  
 
==What is the relationship between owners, property, and other people?==
 
==What is the relationship between owners, property, and other people?==
 
+
{{:A Positive Model Of Rights}}
  
 
==What are the component rights of property?==
 
==What are the component rights of property?==
 
==What are full liberal rights?==
 
  
 
In law, liberal property rights are considered to be bundles of rights because very often these component rights have different owners.  Tony Honoré, in his book [[Making Law Bind: Essays Legal and Philosophical]] p. 165, lists the component rights of ownership of property::
 
In law, liberal property rights are considered to be bundles of rights because very often these component rights have different owners.  Tony Honoré, in his book [[Making Law Bind: Essays Legal and Philosophical]] p. 165, lists the component rights of ownership of property::
Line 63: Line 61:
  
 
According to Honoré, for full ownership in a thing to be recognised, an individual must hold most (but not necessarily all) of these elements regarding that thing.
 
According to Honoré, for full ownership in a thing to be recognised, an individual must hold most (but not necessarily all) of these elements regarding that thing.
 +
 +
Full liberal rights would consist of all these elements.
  
 
==Are there different rights for public property?==
 
==Are there different rights for public property?==

Revision as of 17:55, 22 February 2016