Difference between revisions of "What is wrong (and right) in economics?/powerful"

From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "<!-- you can have any number of categories here --> Category:Dani Rodrik Category:Common Fallacies Of Economics Category:Economics {{Quote | text = There are power...")
 
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
[[Category:Economics]]
 
[[Category:Economics]]
 
{{Quote
 
{{Quote
| text = There are powerful forces having to do with the sociology of the profession and the socialization process that tend to push economists to think alike. Most economists start graduate school not having spent much time thinking about social problems or having studied much else besides math and economics. The incentive and hierarchy systems tend to reward those with the technical skills rather than interesting questions or research agendas. An in-group versus out-group mentality develops rather early on that pits economists against other social scientists. [...] [E]conomists tend to look down on other social scientists, as those distant, less competent cousins who may ask interestin g questions sometimes but never get the answers right. Or, if their answers are right, they are so not for the methodologically correct reasons. Even economists who come from different intellectual traditions are typically treated as “not real economists” or “not serious economists.”
+
| text = There are powerful forces having to do with the sociology of the profession and the socialization process that tend to push economists to think alike. Most economists start graduate school not having spent much time thinking about social problems or having studied much else besides math and economics. The incentive and hierarchy systems tend to reward those with the technical skills rather than interesting questions or research agendas. An in-group versus out-group mentality develops rather early on that pits economists against other social scientists. [...] [E]conomists tend to look down on other social scientists, as those distant, less competent cousins who may ask interesting questions sometimes but never get the answers right. Or, if their answers are right, they are so not for the methodologically correct reasons. Even economists who come from different intellectual traditions are typically treated as “not real economists” or “not serious economists.”
  
 
| cite = [[Dani Rodrik]], "{{Link |What is wrong (and right) in economics?}}"
 
| cite = [[Dani Rodrik]], "{{Link |What is wrong (and right) in economics?}}"
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 13:52, 2 October 2019