View source for Introduction To Libertarianism
From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to:
navigation
,
search
{{Under Construction}} Libertarianism can be divided into three major realms. (There might be unimportant others.) ==Political Libertarianism== Political libertarianism is the libertarianism that we are exposed to through the media, the mass market libertarianism. Political libertarianism, like the media, is controlled top-down by plutocrats and operated for the benefit of plutocrats. It is not about "[[liberty]]" or "[[freedom]]": it is about ownership. The plutocrats want to convince the populace that: * Ownership of the vast majority of the world's wealth by plutocrats is legitimate and untouchable. * Changing that distribution will result in assorted horrors for everybody, including loss of liberty and freedom. Their objective is to get more wealth and prevent losing any wealth to taxation or other liabilities. Political libertarianism is dominated by [[Public Relations|public relations]] programs that have been around since at least the 1930's, reacting to [[Progressivism]]. The [[Mount Pelerin Society]] in the 1950's began a great expansion of these programs. The [[Charles and David Koch|Koch brothers]] have largely organized or controlled these public relations programs, and they scored their first big successes in the 1980's under Reagan. Without the hundreds of millions of dollars pumped into public relations programs, right-wing political libertarianism would be just another fringe political belief as small as left-libertarianism. This is also called [[Vulgar Libertarianism|vulgar libertarianism]] by Kevin Carson. The message really is: “Them pore ole bosses need all the help they can get.” Political libertarianism maintains a continual drumbeat of propaganda: attempting to inject libertarian ideas and terminology into almost every public issue while filtering out opposition, because repetition is the heart of propaganda. A more complete description of this methodology is found in [[Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media]]. Political libertarianism is why the Critiques Of Libertarianism site is so very large: propagandists attempt to shoehorn almost every issue and subject into libertarian ideology. (Short list of plutocratic funded libertarian-oriented organizations needed here.) ==Individualistic Libertarianism== Individualistic libertarianism is what the targets of political libertarianism believe. This is a huge morass of conflicting ideas with only one constant: the political libertarian idea that ownership should be sacred. Ask a libertarian what part of ownership they would give up to achieve any other social end, and they will say no part. It doesn't matter if some socialistic government (such as roads or defense) would benefit the lives of everybody; they despise it because it conflicts with their property, no matter how meager. Individualistic libertarianism is bottom-up: it is not controlled directly by political libertarians beyond manipulation by propaganda. These useful idiots can be relied upon to inject libertarian viewpoints into discussions that are not controlled by the mass media. They are as welcome as door-to-door evangelists from another religion. Individualistic libertarianism ranges from the honorable and sincere to the vile and repulsive, with stops along the way for the immature, foolish, and intemperate. You've got your government haters, racists, sexists, pederasts, conspiracy theorists, tax evaders, exploiters and other socially repulsive types generously represented in this category. Especially because they are rejected by mainstream parties for obnoxious views. That's not entirely bad, as Noam Chomsky has observed: libertarians have great tolerance of diverse views as long as they denounce government and promote private property. ==Libertarian Philosophy== Libertarian philosophy is mostly corrupt: much of it is funded by plutocrats to provide ideas and materials for their public relations campaigns. Hayek, for example, never held an academic position that wasn't funded by plutocrats. (Milton Friedman and Robert Nozick are exceptions to this funding generalization.) Common [[Failures Of Libertarian Philosophy|failures of libertarian philosophy]] include: * apriori reasoning * natural rights * self-ownership * individualism * the assumption of property * single value reasoning * misframings * ignoring anthropology These are all erroneous assumptions or fallacies of argument. (This is not the ancient nondeterministic philosophical libertarianism concept that means free will.) For more on this, see the [[Philosophy]] index.
Template:DES
(
view source
)
Template:Extension DPL
(
view source
)
Template:Quotations
(
view source
)
Return to
Introduction To Libertarianism
.
Navigation menu
Views
Page
Discussion
View source
History
Personal tools
Log in
Search
Search For Page Title
in Wikipedia
with Google
Translate This Page
Google Translate
Navigation
Main Page (fast)
Main Page (long)
Blog
Original Critiques site
What's new
Current events
Recent changes
Bibliography
List of all indexes
All indexed pages
All unindexed pages
All external links
Random page
Under Construction
To Be Added
Site Information
About This Site
About The Author
How You Can Help
Support us at Patreon!
Site Features
Site Status
Credits
Notes
Help
Toolbox
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Guidelines To Create
Indexable Page/Quote
Indexable Book/Quote
Indexable Quote
Unindexed
Templates
Edit Sidebar
Purge cache this page