View source for Liberty
From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to:
navigation
,
search
<!-- you can have any number of categories here --> [[Category:Liberty, Rights, Property, Coercion, Government, Markets and Captialism|100]] {{DES | des = Liberty, or freedom, is a zero-sum game. For me to have a liberty, your liberty must be restricted by a duty not to interfere. The liberty of your nose depends on a coercive duty imposed on me to not swing my fist into it. Liberty can be redistributed, but not created or destroyed. Pretending otherwise is one of the great frauds of libertarianism.| show=}} http://www.cato-unbound.org/2010/03/10/david-schmidtz-and-jason-brennan/conceptions-of-freedom/ http://www.cato-unbound.org/2010/03/12/tom-g-palmer/liberty-is-liberty/ http://www.cato-unbound.org/2010/03/23/david-schmidtz-and-jason-brennan/reflections-on-the-history-and-language-of-liberty/ liberty as half a see-saw, other half being duty to respect liebrty: x axis me to you, y axis liberty to duty If only half the see saw is moved, it is a broken model David Schmidtz and Jason Brennan, "A Brief History of Liberty" Berlin says historians documented two hundred ways of using the term "liberty", and he is writing only about two central ones, positive and negative. Constant’s distinction between individual [“modern”] and collective [“ancient”] liberty liberty must be discussed initially as an individual right. Freedom is an inherently social concept, devoid of meaning outside of society, whereas the concept of assets (or wealth) is not an inherently social concept. A man all alone on a planet, with no connections with other moral agents, can hardly be said to be either free or unfree. He doesn’t live in a free society, just as he doesn’t live in a generous society. For the same reason, he could not be said to be unfree. He doesn’t live in a society, at all. Liberty, like generosity and kindness, refers to a relationship among persons (or at least among moral beings of some sort). (It may involve other terms, as well, but it is nonsensical to invoke the concept of liberty without invoking a multiplicity of persons.) Tom Palmer One man's liberty is another man's slavery. Often literally: the liberty to own slaves has been a frequent, real world oxymoron. For one man to have uncoerced freedom, all others must have a coerced duty to not interfere with that freedom. There can be no maximizing of liberty overall: only redistribution of liberty and coercion. See Also: * [[Liberty (propaganda)]] <!-- DPL has problems with categories that have a single quote in them. Use these explicit workarounds. --> <!-- normally, we would use {{Links}} and {{Quotes}} --> {{List|Liberty|links=true}} {{Quotations|Liberty|quotes=true}}
Template:DES
(
view source
)
Template:Extension DPL
(
view source
)
Template:List
(
view source
)
Template:Quotations
(
view source
)
Template:QuoteOne
(
view source
)
Template:Red
(
view source
)
Return to
Liberty
.
Navigation menu
Views
Page
Discussion
View source
History
Personal tools
18.222.196.175
Talk for this IP address
Log in
Search
Search For Page Title
in Wikipedia
with Google
Translate This Page
Google Translate
Navigation
Main Page (fast)
Main Page (long)
Blog
Original Critiques site
What's new
Current events
Recent changes
Bibliography
List of all indexes
All indexed pages
All unindexed pages
All external links
Random page
Under Construction
To Be Added
Site Information
About This Site
About The Author
How You Can Help
Support us at Patreon!
Site Features
Site Status
Credits
Notes
Help
Toolbox
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Guidelines To Create
Indexable Page/Quote
Indexable Book/Quote
Indexable Quote
Unindexed
Templates
Edit Sidebar
Purge cache this page