View source for Analyzing Libertarian Arguments
From Critiques Of Libertarianism
Jump to:
navigation
,
search
[[Category:Basics|900]] {{DES | des = First steps to analyzing libertarian arguments.}} ; Elevating rules of thumb to absolutes. : Allowing ownership does not imply allowing unlimited ownership. ; Where are the tradeoffs? : Very few arguments are about open and shut cases. Almost always, there are tradeoffs involved, and reasonable people can disagree on the conclusion because they have different values. What tradeoffs are left out? Which values are presumed to trump others? Given that disagreement cannot be resolved, how should the answer be decided? (Libertarians do NOT have a good answer for that.) ; How is the question loaded? : "When did you stop beating your wife?" is the classic loaded question. It slides in a presumption of moral incorrectness. (See Shalizi example.) Loading can be accomplished with propaganda terms, dog-whistle terms, and a host of other indirect methods. The best response to loaded questions is to shame the questioner for his tactic. ; Does the argument pretend to logic? If not, point out how unconvincing the illogical argument is. If it does pretend to logic, conservative and libertarian arguments almost always fail logically, with bad assumptions or clear fallacies. Nozick's pretend induction, for example. ; Does the argument start with the usual suspects? : There are several very common false assumptions used by libertarians. ** economic man ** rational man ** markets work best ; Does the argument try to say what you think or believe? : When it's not a deliberate tarbrushing, strawman or misrepresentation, it might be: ** psychological projection: "you have to have an ideology!" ** assuming that because you disagree with one thing, all your ideas are opposite. "If you oppose this freedom, you think everybody should be slaves!" Milton Friedman used this one: (paraphrased) "would you rather have mercenaries or slaves as soldiers?" (find a source) ; Does the argument ignore the diversity of existing alternatives? : For example, criticisms of the US two party system little notice that multiparty systems in other nations hardly give different results. ; Is the argument a conspiracy theory? : For example, if libertarians claim that you have been brainwashed by the state through its schools, it is easy to notice that there is no obvious "truth" coming from private schools or schools in other nations.
Template:DES
(
view source
)
Template:Extension DPL
(
view source
)
Template:List
(
view source
)
Template:Quotations
(
view source
)
Template:Red
(
view source
)
Return to
Analyzing Libertarian Arguments
.
Navigation menu
Views
Page
Discussion
View source
History
Personal tools
3.141.193.244
Talk for this IP address
Log in
Search
Search For Page Title
in Wikipedia
with Google
Translate This Page
Google Translate
Navigation
Main Page (fast)
Main Page (long)
Blog
Original Critiques site
What's new
Current events
Recent changes
Bibliography
List of all indexes
All indexed pages
All unindexed pages
All external links
Random page
Under Construction
To Be Added
Site Information
About This Site
About The Author
How You Can Help
Support us at Patreon!
Site Features
Site Status
Credits
Notes
Help
Toolbox
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Guidelines To Create
Indexable Page/Quote
Indexable Book/Quote
Indexable Quote
Unindexed
Templates
Edit Sidebar
Purge cache this page